Saturday, September 29, 2007

An essay on childhood

From "Mimsy were the Borogoves":

"Neither Paradine nor Jane guessed how much of an effect the contents of the time machine were having on the kids. How could they? Youngsters are instinctive dramatists, for purposes of self-protection. They have not yet fitted themselves to the exigencies – to them partially inexplicable – of a mature world. Moreover, their lives are complicated by human variables. They are told by one person that playing in the mud is permissible, but that, in their excavations, they must not uproot flowers or small trees. Another adult vetoes mud per se. The Ten Commandments are not carved on stone; they vary, and children are helplessly dependent on the caprice of those who give them birth and feed and clothe them. And tyrannize. The wound animal does not resent that benevolent tyranny, for it is an essential part of nature. He is, however, an individualist, and maintains his integrity by a subtle, passive fight.

Under the eyes of an adult he changes. Like an actor on-stage, when he remembers, he strives to please, and also to attract attention to himself. Such attempts are not unknown to maturity. But adults are less obvious – to other adults.

It is difficult to admit that children lack subtlety. Children are different from the mature animal because they think in another way. We can more or less easily pierce the pretenses they set up – but they can do the same to us. Ruthlessly a child can destroy the pretenses of an adult. Iconoclasm is their prerogative.

Foppishness, for example. The amenities of social intercourse, exaggerated not quite to absurdity. The gigolo-

”Such savoir faire! Such punctilious courtesy!” The dowager and the blond young thing are often impressed. Men have less pleasant comments to make. But the child goes to the root of the matter.

”You’re silly!”

How can an immature human understand the complicated system of social relationships? He can’t. To him, an exaggeration of natural courtesy is silly. In his functional structure of life-patterns, it is rococo. He is an egotistic little animal, who cannot visualize himself in the position of another – certainly not an adult. A self-contained, almost perfect natural unit, his wants supplied by others, the child is much like a unicellular creature floating in the blood stream, nutriment carried to him, waste products carried away-

From the standpoint of logic, a child is rather horribly perfect. A baby may be even more perfect, but so alien to an adult that only superficial standards of comparison apply. The thought processes of an infant are completely unimaginable. But babies think, even before birth. In the womb they move and sleep, not entirely through instinct. We are conditioned to react rather peculiarly to the idea that a nearly-viable embryo may think. We are surprised, shocked into laughter, and repelled. Nothing human is alien.

But a baby is not human. An embryo is far less human.

That, perhaps, was why Emma learned more from the toys than did Scott.

--

That is why, perhaps, I wish I was still a kid.

I wish I could write like that. But really, how many of us don't want to throw in a discussion on philosophy in the middle of our short stories. That, my friend, takes chops. I first saw this story when I was young, and reading this again now (at the ripe age of 22) blows my mind.

But I'm sorry, I gotta go. I'm off to paint in three dimensions.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Life on September 26.

Hi blog,

Long time no see. My bad. I take responsibility. I've been busy.

Work is going great. I am learning so much.

KU Football is rocking.

I gave a presentation yesterday on Web 2.0. Let me know if you want to learn more.

I'll be back, I promise.

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

Free food for you, possibly

Hi world,

I know how much all of you love free food and me. We are talking about two great things, if you asked me about it.

I want to buy you dinner. But like all things free, this one comes with a catch.

Here's the deal...I am currently a salesman for the University Daily Kansan this summer. I am looking for clients and you, my lovelies, are my best connections to highly qualified prospects.

If you connect me with a decision maker at any business, organization, cause, or whatever that might want to advertise, I'm buying dinner.

Here are some talking points for your conversation (As I'm sure you all know).

Advertising in the Kansan is...
...the best way to reach the student body.
...read by the 10,000 students who take summer classes.
...easy, quick, and painless. I will guide a prospective client in creating the ad, placing it, and helping determine effectiveness.

Please feel free to let me know if anything comes to mind.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

J.S. Mill is my kindof guy

I just turned in my Western Civ II paper a few minutes ago which was a focus his work On Liberty. Amazing book, by the way. I'm not even joking. Every time I re-read it, it makes me want to be a libertarian. And that's saying something.

However, this particular time I read it... I felt an overwhelming since of dread.

We're screwed.

As a nation.

As a society.

As a civilization.

Maybe even as a species.

Here is my intro paragraph from an early draft:

In John Stewart Mill’s On Liberty, he envisions a dystopia that will come about if human kind as a whole ceases to value individualism as the chief value of the human experience. He believes that if humans continue to value the opinion of the masses over the importance of difference of opinion, we will quickly be “encroached” with overwhelming uniformity where “all deviations from that type will come to be considered impious, immoral, even monstrous and contrary to nature. Mankind speedily become unable to conceive diversity when they have been for some time unaccustomed to see it.” (Mill 71). Mill’s concerns over despotism and the forces that crush individualism are as valid today in 2007, as they were when he originally wrote On Liberty in 1859. Moreover, unless we as a human race recognize these concerns and take active steps to value individual differences of opinion, humankind is destined for a dystopian civilization that will make it impossible to do so in the future.

So I wrote that. And then at the end, I interpreted current forces that were crushing individualism...and there is a ton. Mills contention is that when people stop valuing being different, we cease to expand as a species. And, people, we've stopped.

Like Rome, maybe our time has come.

A civilization that can thus succumb to its vanquished enemy, must first have become so degenerate, that neither its appointed priests and teachers, nor anybody else, has the capacity, or will take the trouble, to stand up for it. If this be so, the sooner such a civilization receives notice to quit, the better. It can only go on from bad to worse, until destroyed and regenerated (like the Western Empire) by energetic barbarians. (On Liberty, Mill, Ch. 4)

--

This is where B pops me upside the head for being a pessimist. I sure hope I'm wrong. Anyone out there? I have no problem being completely off-base with this. I am sure I am in some regards, but seriously how far away are we from 2+2=5?

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Too busy to write in this blog...

...you should check out this one.

Delta Force is rockin' and rollin'. Super exciting right now. Seriously, go over there right now. I'm not even joking.

Wee! Thursday is to-morrow!